Christ's Mouthpiece Speaks!
Pat Robertson was on Paula Zahn's CNN program last night. He had some pretty outrageous things to say, as usual, including the claim that he warned President Bush there would be casualties in the war in Iraq, and that Bush responded with confidence that he did not believe there would be any.
The unmitigated arrogance of people who claim, without doubt or reservation, to know and understand God's will always astounds me. I think that as individuals, we certainly can come to an understanding of God's will for our own life. However, to claim to know that "God's blessing" is on a political leader, and then to routinely say as much to others of Faith, is an incredible presumption.
Robertson goes on to offer some more choice tid-bits for the damned heathen like myself to get bent about. Robertson says about the Iraq war, for example, "I mean, the Lord told me it was going to be A, a disaster, and B, messy," Robertson said. "I warned him about casualties."
Let me see if I understand this correctly, Robertson, a Christian minister, knew the war was going to be a disaster, and that there would be many casualties. And yet he let Bush go ahead with the war with his tacit approval. And now he still supports Bush? Come on.
One is tempted to go back to the Bible, specifically the Old Testament, and demonstrate to Robertson that when a leader has turned a war into a "messy disaster," it has been because God's blessing has not been upon that leader.
Somehow I don't think Robertson reads his Bible much these days, at least not with the open heart that is necessary for truly hearing God's Word. God's prophets are almost invariably critics of the status quo who speak uncomfortable truth to power, rather than affirmers of the King's will. The United States itself is a country founded on the principle that there is no Divine Right of Kings. Yet here we have a minister claiming that George Bush is indeed divinely appointed. That viewpoint is by no means confined to Robertson, either.
In Ron Suskind's fascinating New York Times article Without A Doubt, he relates how he often heard Christian supporters express the belief that Bush was appointed by God to lead the country. One such supporter at a rally in Poplar Bluffs, Missouri, told Suskind, "I believe he's an instrument of God, but I have to be careful about what I say, you know, in public." Suskind asks, "Is there anyone in America who feels that John Kerry is an instrument of God?"
"And I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying to say, 'Mr. President, you had better prepare the American people for casualties.' "Robertson goes on to express again, in case other Christians haven't heard him when he has said it the hundred previous times, that "the blessing of heaven is on Bush."
Robertson said the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties."
The unmitigated arrogance of people who claim, without doubt or reservation, to know and understand God's will always astounds me. I think that as individuals, we certainly can come to an understanding of God's will for our own life. However, to claim to know that "God's blessing" is on a political leader, and then to routinely say as much to others of Faith, is an incredible presumption.
Robertson goes on to offer some more choice tid-bits for the damned heathen like myself to get bent about. Robertson says about the Iraq war, for example, "I mean, the Lord told me it was going to be A, a disaster, and B, messy," Robertson said. "I warned him about casualties."
Let me see if I understand this correctly, Robertson, a Christian minister, knew the war was going to be a disaster, and that there would be many casualties. And yet he let Bush go ahead with the war with his tacit approval. And now he still supports Bush? Come on.
One is tempted to go back to the Bible, specifically the Old Testament, and demonstrate to Robertson that when a leader has turned a war into a "messy disaster," it has been because God's blessing has not been upon that leader.
Somehow I don't think Robertson reads his Bible much these days, at least not with the open heart that is necessary for truly hearing God's Word. God's prophets are almost invariably critics of the status quo who speak uncomfortable truth to power, rather than affirmers of the King's will. The United States itself is a country founded on the principle that there is no Divine Right of Kings. Yet here we have a minister claiming that George Bush is indeed divinely appointed. That viewpoint is by no means confined to Robertson, either.
In Ron Suskind's fascinating New York Times article Without A Doubt, he relates how he often heard Christian supporters express the belief that Bush was appointed by God to lead the country. One such supporter at a rally in Poplar Bluffs, Missouri, told Suskind, "I believe he's an instrument of God, but I have to be careful about what I say, you know, in public." Suskind asks, "Is there anyone in America who feels that John Kerry is an instrument of God?"





4 Comments:
At 10/20/2004 03:18:00 PM,
Mark said…
I've always questioned those who feel religion or morals are the right reason to vote for someone. Just because someone prays to the same God, will they really look out for you? And furthermore, is being blessed really the most important quality to look for in a president? Aren't there countless individuals who share Bush's outlook and are equally "moral" people who are dangerously unqualified to be president (I would go so far to say that Bush also happens to be dangerously unqualified)? Couldn't the right at least find a man who is statesmanlike, eloquent, and politically experienced that embodies their belief system? Maybe one that would be willing to raise taxes when it is politically salient would help, too.
At 10/20/2004 03:57:00 PM,
Kaysea said…
Mr. Robertson seemed pretty optimistic here in April 2003. While we haven't hit 3000 yet, and I hope we don't, it's certainly not the "eating crow", "coming out with hands in the air" situation he talks about then. And the losses don't seem to be slowing down any either. I know there's a lot of other stuff being eaten these days, but it's not crow.
At 10/20/2004 04:03:00 PM,
Matthew said…
Interesting find. I wonder what Robertson would do if confronted by his own claims that naysayers would be "eating crow?" Apparently he was one of those naysayers, according to what he now says ... but he'd probably say he voiced his concerns to the President long before the war.
At 10/22/2004 07:31:00 AM,
Anonymous said…
Actually, one of my favorite illogical Robertson statements goes something like this:
"After that gay pride march in Fort Lauderdale, there was a devastating huricane. Surely this is God's judgment on homosexuality." I use that one when I teach the fallacy of faulty causality :)
Few things (ok, none probably) get me angrier than fat-headed pontificators like Robertson, especially since it impacts me personally as my parents watch the 700 Club every morning to get their "unbiased" news. I have to grit my teeth every time mom tells me how "liberal" NPR is; my dad uses much harsher language. I heard Robertson interviewed on Diane Reihms (?) a year or two ago and found him pathethic, going on and on about people in India worshipping death or some such thing. He just sounded juvenile and pathetic.
Anyway, I thought I'd also mention one of my favorite sources of information (ok, two) that take an equal dislike to Robertson and other Religious Righters who think they speak for God.
Sojourners: www.sojo.net
I can't say enough good things about this site. They provide a refreshingly sane religious perspective and are currently (well, I think they pretty much always are) pissed off at the Religious Right.
The Door Magazine: www.thedoormagazine.com
For a more humorous perspective; Robertson earned their "lifetime loser" award some time back. Granted, I'm still a little sore they didn't accept my Prayer Before Sex piece, but I'm mostly over that . . . :)
Dawn
Post a Comment
<< Home